Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!cs.uoregon.edu!ns.uoregon.edu!milton!ogicse!pdxgate!parsely!percy!qiclab!al
From: al@qiclab.scn.rain.com (Al Peterman)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Another 9600 protocol!
Message-ID: <1991Mar11.214402.25588@qiclab.scn.rain.com>
Date: 11 Mar 91 21:44:02 GMT
References: <6956.27D86C08@zswamp.fidonet.org> <1991Mar9.204759.65016@pttrnl.nl>
Organization: SCN Research/QIC Laboratories of Tigard Oregon
Lines: 17

In article <1991Mar9.204759.65016@pttrnl.nl> walvdrk_r@pttrnl.nl writes:
>
>The 'problem' with that 'new' thing is the lack of information. The original 
>poster was so kind as to copy part of the advertisement but that didn't give 
>any clues about the actually used modulation technique. 

I posted the original posting, and believe me, that WAS the most informative
section.  The rest was even less informative technically.  That's why I
put the info out, so we could find out IF this is a decent piece of gear, and
IF it is going to just add more confusion.  I've allready voted for V.32
with my wallet...  On the other hand, it's not the worst BS I've seen in an
ad - the TICE clock gets that award...


-- 
Alan L. Peterman                                   (503)-684-1984 hm
                       al@qiclab.scn.rain.com