Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!pacbell.com!lll-winken!amazon.llnl.gov!oberman
From: oberman@amazon.llnl.gov
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Subject: Re: it's almost a shame to upgrade 'em
Message-ID: <1991Mar9.144127.1@amazon.llnl.gov>
Date: 9 Mar 91 21:41:27 GMT
References: <33128@boulder.Colorado.EDU>
Sender: usenet@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV
Lines: 16
Nntp-Posting-Host: amazon.llnl.gov

In article <33128@boulder.Colorado.EDU>, jliv@gibbs.SFSU.EDU (John Loiacono) writes:
> I don't get it!  Are terminal servers usually unreliable?  Are you 
> folks being forced into upgrading?  Why all the praise about a product
> that doesn't crash?
 
Who the heck is talking about terminal servers? The AGS(+) is a multiprotocol
router. And, if you have played with most of them (including some early cisco
releases), you would be impressed, too.

					R. Kevin Oberman
					Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
					Internet: oberman@icdc.llnl.gov
   					(415) 422-6955

Disclaimer: Don't take this too seriously. I just like to improve my typing
and probably don't really know anything useful about anything.