Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!csn!boulder!daemon
From: dan@sci.ccny.cuny.edu (Dan Schlitt)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Subject: Re: it's almost a shame to upgrade 'em
Message-ID: <33209@boulder.Colorado.EDU>
Date: 12 Mar 91 19:55:51 GMT
Sender: news@boulder.Colorado.EDU
Lines: 16

>
>>I don't get it!  Are terminal servers usually unreliable?  Are you 
>>folks being forced into upgrading?  Why all the praise about a product
>>that doesn't crash?
>
>Lets broaden the stakes here a bit.  If you compare the uptime of routers by 
>another manufacturer (cough) to cisco, the cisco more than holds it own :-).
>
I think that you should be a little careful in your praise.  You may
bring some cisco users out of the woodwork who will have strong and
rather different opinions about the performance of the routers and of
cisco in admiting and fixing the problems with their routers.

But I'm glad you're happy with your choice.

/dan