Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!bu.edu!telecom-request
From: nol2105%dsacg2.dsac.dla.mil@dsac.dla.mil (Robert E. Zabloudil)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Caller ID Status Report
Message-ID: <telecom11.186.2@eecs.nwu.edu>
Date: 8 Mar 91 00:08:23 GMT
Sender: news@bu.edu.bu.edu
Organization: Defense Logistics Agency Systems Automation Center, Columbus
Lines: 10
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 11, Issue 186, Message 2 of 14


In article <telecom11.166.12@eecs.nwu.edu> TELECOM Moderator responds
to cyberoid@milton.u.washington.edu (Robert Jacobson):

< [Moderator's Note: Thanks for pointing this out. I wonder if the lack
< of California details in the chart was an oversight by the original
< author or somehow a typo error by the person sending it here?   PAT]

I thought I only counted 49 entries.  Since DC was included, that would mean
another state was left off?