Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!igor!rutabaga!jls From: jls@rutabaga.Rational.COM (Jim Showalter) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ada-c++ productivity Message-ID: Date: 8 Mar 91 20:58:20 GMT References: <1991Mar7.163106.29477@wdl1.wdl.loral.com> Sender: news@Rational.COM Distribution: usa Lines: 12 >Can anyone provide references which address productivity (either development >or maintenance) utilizing an full object-oriented language (say C++) vs. >Ada? Oh good grief. I'm so sick of Ada being called non-object-oriented. An Ada type is an object, as is anything with state. What you really mean is non-inheritance-oriented. -- ***** DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed herein are my own. Duh. Like you'd ever be able to find a company (or, for that matter, very many people) with opinions like mine. -- "When I want your opinion, I'll beat it out of you."