Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!zoot.avgrp.cr.rok.com!dah From: dah@zoot.avgrp.cr.rok.com (Dave Haverkamp) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: What C++ implementation is best for Sparcs? Message-ID: <1991Mar12.155034.12561@zoot.avgrp.cr.rok.com> Date: 12 Mar 91 15:50:34 GMT References: <1195@usage.csd.unsw.oz.au> Organization: Rockwell International; Cedar Rapids, IA Lines: 23 In article vaughan@puma.cad.mcc.com (Paul Vaughan) writes: > >I tried to mail this, but the message was returned. Anyway, this gets >asked often enough to warrant a posting. > >mackin@vast.eecs.unsw.oz (John Mackin) wrote > > What C++ implementation is best for Sparcs? . . . > [*** Stuff deleted... ***] So what is the most resonable C++ compiler and environment to have for multiple workstation platforms? ( Apollo, Sparcs, DECstations & possibly VAXstations...). All of the specific WS makers only have C++ for their product(s). I do know G++ will run on almost everything... so... What third party C++ compilers will run on multiple palatforms and if someone could compare them, how do they rate? -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- David A. Haverkamp Collins Commercial Avionics Division Rockwell International MS 124-211 INTERNET: dah@zoot.avgrp.cr.rok.com Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52498