Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!hellgate.utah.edu!csn!ub!dsinc!unix.cis.pitt.edu!pitt!willett!ForthNet
From: ForthNet@willett.pgh.pa.us (ForthNet articles from GEnie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Conditionals !
Message-ID: <2495.UUL1.3#5129@willett.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 13 Mar 91 03:29:19 GMT
Organization: (n.) to be organized.  But that's not important right now.
Lines: 21


 Date: 03-09-91 (11:00)              Number: 1464 of 1465 (Echo)
   To: CHRIS WATERS                  Refer#: 1445
 From: RAY DUNCAN                      Read: NO
 Subj: CONDITIONALS !                Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE
 Conf: FORTH (58)                 Read Type: GENERAL (+)

    >I used LMI Forth at my last job about 4 years ago but I don't
    >remember .IF.  Is this a new addition to LMI?

 It was introduced in the UR/FORTH implementations ca. 1986 then moved
 into PC/FORTH and PC/FORTH+ when they were overhauled for high-level
 compatibility with UR/FORTH in 1988.

 NET/Mail : LMI Forth Board, Los Angeles, CA (213) 306-3530
 <<<>>>
-----
This message came from GEnie via willett.  You *cannot* reply to the author
using e-mail.  Please post a follow-up article, or use any instructions
the author may have included (USMail addresses, telephone #, etc.).
Report problems to: dwp@willett.pgh.pa.us _or_ uunet!willett!dwp