Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!menudo.uh.edu!lobster!nuchat!sugar!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: A comment on language wars. Message-ID: Date: 11 Mar 91 17:09:06 GMT References: <2400032@otter.hpl.hp.com> Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 12 In article <2400032@otter.hpl.hp.com> sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com (Steve Knight) writes: > The "trick" to avoiding the necessity of an interpreter for a procedure in > a dynamically-typed system is as follows. [...] In Poplog, this is done by > the simple expedient of placing [type, lengthe, etc] "before" the procedure > pointer. You look up the type and make a decision based on what's there? That's an interpreter. Forth does the same thing, but puts the type information after the procedure pointer. -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' peter@ferranti.com +1 713 274 5180. 'U` "Have you hugged your wolf today?"