Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!uwm.edu!bionet!agate!ucbvax!LCCMAIL.OCF.LLNL.GOV!Jimmy_Guse.NSD
From: Jimmy_Guse.NSD@LCCMAIL.OCF.LLNL.GOV (Jimmy Guse)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.dev-environ
Subject: RE>A static server.
Message-ID: <9103112220.AA24362@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 11 Mar 91 16:07:53 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 14


        Reply to:   RE>A static server.
> I would like to know if the design of the
> initiator and the responder should follow a different philosophy.

A fundamental problem with ISODE is that it does not support multi-tasking.
This is generally the way one implements static servers.

If anyone is running an implementation of ISODE over a tasking package
(of most any kind), I would be very interested in some of the solution
strategies.

Jimmy
guse@llnl.gov