Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!jarthur!ucivax!gateway
From: S.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.UK (Steve Kille)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400.gateway
Subject: Re: RFC-1148/2: what about underlines
Message-ID: <1704.668797563@UK.AC.UCL.CS>
Date: 13 Mar 91 04:43:47 GMT
Lines: 20
Approved: usenet@ICS.UCI.EDU
In-reply-to: Your message of 06 Mar 91 08:30:24 +0000. <1159@sicsun.epfl.ch>
Phone: +44-71-380-7294



 >From:  Bertrand Buclin <buclin@ch.epfl.sic>
 >To:    ifip-gtwy@ch.epfl.sic
 >Subject: Re: RFC-1148/2: what about underlines
 >Date:  6 Mar 91 08:30:24 GMT


 >>In order to enhance the interconnectivity, I suggest ...
 >That RFC-1148bis be also a revision of RFC-987 (officially). Except RFC1026
 >there has been (officially) no revision of RFC-987. I agree that part of
 >RFC-1148 could also apply to X.400(84), but it needs to be stated.

I have come around to this opinion, and if I'm being honest, my major reason
for not doing it in the first place was laziness.  RFC 1148 has just fixed
too many bugs in RFC 987.  I will be adding an annexe to 1148bis which
specifies its application for 1984 nets.


Steve