Xref: utzoo comp.protocols.nfs:1935 comp.windows.ms:10199
Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!sun-barr!newstop!sun!amdcad!brahms!phil
From: phil@brahms.amd.com (Phil Ngai)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs,comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Sun PC-NFS deficiencies
Message-ID: <1991Mar12.224029.13249@amd.com>
Date: 12 Mar 91 22:40:29 GMT
References: <1991Mar11.232450.5556@amd.com> <1991Mar12.050857.24535@ccad.uiowa.edu>
Sender: usenet@amd.com (NNTP Posting)
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc; Sunnyvale, CA
Lines: 19

In article <1991Mar12.050857.24535@ccad.uiowa.edu>
cadsi@ccad.uiowa.edu (CADSI) writes:
|> hands on 3.5 but from reading their press release and talking to people,
|> it sounds like the Sun PC-NFS group still doesn't understand what PC
|> networks are supposed to be like.
|
|From your article, you misunderstand the use of PC-NFS.  Its purpose is to
|allow use of UNIX network (RPC protocol) facilities.  Something quite

Oh, is that what it is? Too bad Sun forgot to tell the networking
people at my company. They want to force all PC users to run
(deficient) Sun PC-NFS. Barf.

At least you admit that (deficient) Sun PC-NFS is not a real
PC network.

--
The government is not your mother.
The government doesn't love you.