Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!tuvie!nestroy!usenet
From: mah@dec1.wu-wien.ac.at (Michael Haberler)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: Re: NE1000 Clarkson PD strangeness,
Message-ID: <1991Mar06.144438.21803@nestroy.wu-wien.ac.at>
Date: 6 Mar 91 14:44:38 GMT
References: <1991Mar06.004805.5386@nestroy.wu-wien.ac.at>
Sender: usenet@nestroy.wu-wien.ac.at (The Usenet User)
Reply-To: mah@nestroy.wu-wien.ac.at
Organization: Wirtschaftsuniversitaet Wien
Lines: 14



In article <1991Mar06.004805.5386@nestroy.wu-wien.ac.at>, mah@nestroy.wu-wien.ac.at (Michael Haberler) writes:
|> (I *think* it's 2 bytes too long on the Echo reply receive, I'll have 
|> to check that again.)

Ok, I investigated some more. 

The receive length fields look perfectly fine, as compared to the 3c501 pd.

I tried cu tcp 2.2D and that WORKS FINE. It also works with the Packet Driver
version of Netwatch. And the University of Minnesota POPmail/PC package V 2.0.

:-( Now I'm confused.