Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!infopiz!lupine!rfg
From: rfg@NCD.COM (Ron Guilmette)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: operator dot?
Message-ID: <4327@lupine.NCD.COM>
Date: 10 Mar 91 02:55:59 GMT
References: <70904@microsoft.UUCP>
Organization: Network Computing Devices, Inc., Mt. View, CA
Lines: 11

In article <70904@microsoft.UUCP> jimad@microsoft.UUCP (Jim ADCOCK) writes:
>Does anyone know what happened to consideration of overloadable operator dot?

We can only hope that people realized that it was a horrible idea, and
that it then died a quiet and lonely death.

-- 

// Ron Guilmette  -  C++ Entomologist
// Internet: rfg@ncd.com      uucp: ...uunet!lupine!rfg
// New motto:  If it ain't broke, try using a bigger hammer.