Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!microsoft!jimad
From: jimad@microsoft.UUCP (Jim ADCOCK)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: template base classes
Message-ID: <71208@microsoft.UUCP>
Date: 11 Mar 91 23:32:36 GMT
References: <AHUTTUNE.91Mar5141930@bulldozer.hut.fi>
Reply-To: jimad@microsoft.UUCP (Jim ADCOCK)
Distribution: comp
Organization: Microsoft Corp., Redmond WA
Lines: 5

Yes.  This is the kind of idea I was suggesting when some time ago
when I said I thought the run-time type problem was really a specific
case of a template problem.  Template ought to be able to do run-time
type checking problems cleanly -- along with other class-derivation 
problems.