Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!munnari.oz.au!manuel!ccadfa!prolix!dac
From: dac@prolix.pub.uu.oz.au (Andrew Clayton)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: Why buy an Amiga?
Message-ID: <18d10a91.ARN1279@prolix.pub.uu.oz.au>
Date: 12 Mar 91 11:35:13 GMT
References: <223@usna.NAVY.MIL> <mikeg.7688@amiganet.chi.il.us> <1991Mar07.004452.1738@ddsw1.MCS.COM>
Reply-To: dac@prolix.pub.uu.oz.au
Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Organization: More like Mis~, really.
Lines: 28

In article <1991Mar07.004452.1738@ddsw1.MCS.COM>, Ben Feen writes:

> I know this really isn't  nice, but... I like IBM's because they break down
> more cleanly.  Ibm's don't GURU - They "Run-time error at ..." and drop to
> dos.  

Yeah?

Tell my copy of Microsoft C (V6.00) that!

Tell my copy of Microsoft Windows ('Application Error' - BRS Time!)

Tell my copy of Glockenspiel C++

Sure, fella, IBM's really never require a three finger salute.

Pull the other one. It plays tunes from Jungle Book in 6/4 time, and spins.

:-(

> whos@ddsw1.MCS.COM | I don't know, who's at DDSW1? | whos@ddsw1.MCS.COM!

Amiga's are scads better than IBM's. Trust me.

The only reason I use IBM's (clones) is for work.

Dac
--