Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!wuarchive!waikato.ac.nz!comp.vuw.ac.nz!canterbury!chem194
From: chem194@csc.canterbury.ac.nz (John Davis)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Re: IBeM on a GVP A3001 and speeding the thing up
Message-ID: <1991Mar13.095936.223@csc.canterbury.ac.nz>
Date: 12 Mar 91 21:05:12 GMT
References: <1991Mar8.003734.18281@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu> <06441.AA06441@babylon.rmt.sub.org> <1991Mar8.204144.10514@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu>
Organization: Chem Dept, U of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
Lines: 17

In article <1991Mar8.204144.10514@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu>, drtiller@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu (Donald Richard Tillery Jr) writes:
> Maybe YOUR GVP board has this new PAL, but mine doesn't and according to GVP
> the vast majority of them DON'T.  We could all spend the $30 for the new PAL
> to run one _incorrectly_written_ program, but I think correcting the problem
> at the source rather than the end user would be a better answer.
>
> Rick Tillery (drtiller@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu)

I'd really like to know exactly _where_ in the CBM manuals it states that
non-word aligned word accesses are illegal? Sure it kills you for backwards
compatibility with 000 machines, but that's irrelevant if you're writing
an 030 only product.

-----------------------------------------------------------
| o  John Davis - CHEM194@canterbury.ac.nz               o |
| o  (Depart)mental Programmer,Chemistry Department      o |
| o  University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand o |