Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!wuarchive!psuvax1!psuvm!dxb132
From: DXB132@psuvm.psu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: An open letter to C=
Message-ID: <91070.123408DXB132@psuvm.psu.edu>
Date: 11 Mar 91 17:34:08 GMT
References: <13275@darkstar.ucsc.edu>
 <1991Mar11.042149.17599@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
 <91070.000848DXB132@psuvm.psu.edu>
 <1991Mar11.061707.3428@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Penn State University
Lines: 16

In article <1991Mar11.061707.3428@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>,
es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita) says:

>In article <91070.000848DXB132@psuvm.psu.edu> DXB132@psuvm.psu.edu writes:
>>In article <1991Mar11.042149.17599@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>,
>>es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita) says:
>>
>        As I understand it, it is Commodore's policy not to allow
>1MB of chip ram in an A500. It is a marketing decision. Although
>        Perhaps this was done so as to give people a reason to
>buy the 2000 instead of the 500. I don't know.

Perhaps it just gives people a reason to hate Commodore marketing even
more (like we didn't already!)

-- Dan Babcock