Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!crackers!cpoint!frog!rmkhome!rmk From: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc Subject: Re: Mont Grant prices < Ed. Discount Keywords: Why not? Message-ID: <9103091142.55@rmkhome.UUCP> Date: 9 Mar 91 22:01:00 GMT References: <46741@nigel.ee.udel.edu> <15564@chaph.usc.edu> Reply-To: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) Organization: The Man With Ten Cats Lines: 31 In article <15564@chaph.usc.edu> aliu@aludra.usc.edu (Alex C. Liu) writes: >In article <46741@nigel.ee.udel.edu> tsarna@pooh (Tyler Sarna) writes: >>In article of >>comp.sys.amiga.misc, Rich Andrews writes: >>> Montgomery Grant [...] Anyone have >>> experiences with them that they could briefly mention to me? >>NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, NEVER >>Do business with Montgomery Grant!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NEVER! >But why? >Sure prices look way too good to be true, but if they are that bad, >how come they keep advertising in "reputable" magazines and havent >been sued yet? 1. They are no longer a Commodore authorized distributor. 2. Magazines stay alive through paid advertising. They can't be too picky. 3. Over the last year or so it has been documented here on the net that MG will sell you a used machine as new. MG has terrible service, and it is a great hassle to get them to replace anything defective. If you buy a machine from MG, Commodore won't touch it with a ten foot pole. You pay your money, and you take your chances. Rick Kelly rmk@rmkhome.UUCP frog!rmkhome!rmk rmk@frog.UUCP