Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!cmcl2!uupsi!sunic!sics.se!ifi!nuug!ugle.unit.no!hanche
From: hanche@imf.unit.no (Harald Hanche-Olsen)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo
Subject: Re: Installation of X11R4 on apollo
Message-ID: <HANCHE.91Mar8185146@hufsa.imf.unit.no>
Date: 8 Mar 91 17:51:46 GMT
References: <1991Feb28.051945.20170@agate.berkeley.edu>
	<101020027@hpcvlx.cv.hp.com>
Sender: news@ugle.unit.no
Organization: The Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Lines: 15
In-Reply-To: tomg@hpcvlx.cv.hp.com's message of 7 Mar 91 21:51:14 GMT


   > You shouldn't try to use UDS for X.  UDS has bugs related to the size of
   > messages you pass through it.  Besides which, it's actually slower than TCP.

   Under SR10.3, UDS is faster.   Prior to SR10.3, UDS was indeed slower than TCP.

UDS?  What's that?  (Do I need to know?)

% man -k uds
uds: nothing appropriate

- Harald Hanche-Olsen <hanche@imf.unit.no>
  Division of Mathematical Sciences
  The Norwegian Institute of Technology
  N-7034 Trondheim, NORWAY