Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!hoss!hoss.unl.edu!greg From: greg@hoss.unl.edu (Lig Lury Jr.) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2 Subject: Re: SnoTerm Keywords: about Snoterm Message-ID: <1991Mar12.200524.21003@hoss.unl.edu> Date: 12 Mar 91 20:05:24 GMT References: <805@seer.UUCP> <13115@darkstar.ucsc.edu> <9689@latcs1.oz.au> Sender: news@hoss.unl.edu (Network News Administer) Organization: University of Nebraska - Lincoln Lines: 47 ... stephens@latcs1.oz.au (Philip J Stephens) writes: >... @ (The Unknown User) writes: >> ProTERM's vt100 is all screwed up though. If a line goes over >> 80 characters, it does one of two (user definable) things: >> >> 1) keeps printing EVERYTHING at the 80th character. This is a >> very naughty thing.. Even though people should put returns at the end of >> lines, sometimes files don't have them, and it pisses me off when >> PRoTERM does this. > All VT100 terminals will do this if auto-wrap is not turned on. So >it's not a ProTERM problem. Yes, in fact it is a standard feature in vt100, and the host system can change auto-wrap status via a standard vt100 ESCape sequence. Like [?7h turns on auto-wrap, [?7l turns it off. ProTERM has a built-in way to do it, but that is priviledged information to those who have a manual. >> 2) ProTERM puts an -extra- return in the output to your screen >> (that is, there is an empty line between the last line of text and the >> continuation). > This shouldn't happen. But I've seen some very old terminals do the >same thing...perhaps the writer of ProTERM had one of these yucky >terminals to work with :-) This is a problem with ProTERM v2.1. V2.2 solves this problem. You'll have to get ahold of InSync software to get the upgrade. Be prepared to prove ownership. >< Philip J. Stephens >< "Many views yield the truth." > >< Hons. student, Computer Science >< "Therefore, be not alone." > >< La Trobe University, Melbourne >< - Prime Song of the viggies, from > >< AUSTRALIA >< THE ENGIMA SCORE by Sheri S Tepper > There are other problems with ProTERM's VT-100, but they have been discussed quite a bit already. -- /// ____ \\\ greg@ /"Share and Enjoy." "Share and Enjoy." "Share and | |/ / \ \| | hoss. / Enjoy." "Share and Enjoy." "Share and Enjoy." \\_(\____/)_// unl. /"Share and Enjoy." "Oh this is ridiculous! Let me out \_\\\/ edu / of here!" "Thank you." "My pleasure!" "ARGH!"