Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!munnari.oz.au!bruce!monu0.cc.monash.edu.au!monu1!vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au!apm279l From: apm279l@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au Newsgroups: comp.sys.handhelds Subject: Re: Creating a group for the hp48 Message-ID: <1991Mar7.144227.86409@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au> Date: 7 Mar 91 04:42:27 GMT References: <71050@microsoft.UUCP> <1991Mar6.160107.23831@en.ecn.purdue.edu> Lines: 37 In article <1991Mar6.160107.23831@en.ecn.purdue.edu>, ryoder@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Robert W Yoder) writes: > > > I would like to add my name to the list of people opposing the creation > of comp.sys.handhelds.hp for the following reasons: > > 1. The current newsgroup is dominated by postings for the hp48, and since > this is the only machine >I< am concerned about, I see no problems. 8-) > > 2. Why should there be separate groups for different machines? You don't > see separate newsgroups for IBM and Apple machines, do you? 8-) > > 3. If comp.sys.handhelds were created, it would mean I would need to > press the space bar when asked by 'rn' if I wanted to subscribe to the > new group, and then I be required to press it AGAIN when asked where I > wanted to put it. On top of that, I would be forced to press 'u' to > unsubscribe to the old group. I am just too busy to have such > inconvenience imposed upon me. 8-) > > 4. It has been pointed out that although the hp48 is hot now, what happens > when a newer, and better machine takes it's place? I realize that the > addition of comp.sys.handhelds.hp will be an irreversible change, and > never again will we be able to create another such group, nor will we > be able to delete it once created. Therefore it is irresponsible and > reckless to even consider making such changes without assurance that > the changes will be satisfactory for all eternity. 8-) > :-) :-) Thankyou Robert, Yes I've seen the light now! You're 100% right, the inconvenience would be unimaginable!! My vote must now (sadly) change! No Comp.sys.hp48 (My arse it will!) Peter