Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!samsung!spool.mu.edu!munnari.oz.au!brolga!uqcspe!cs.uq.oz.au!grue
From: grue@cs.uq.oz.au (Frobozz)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.handhelds
Subject: Re: comp.sys.handhelds.rpl
Message-ID: <80@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au>
Date: 11 Mar 91 23:00:45 GMT
References: <9102270829.AA09759@nic.gac.edu> <1991Mar8.022735.2424@cc.ic.ac.uk> <1991Mar9.072250.29718@eecs.nwu.edu>
Sender: news@cs.uq.oz.au
Reply-To: grue@cs.uq.oz.au
Lines: 27

In <1991Mar9.072250.29718@eecs.nwu.edu> kaufman@eecs.nwu.edu (Michael L. Kaufman) writes:

>This is the first really intelligent choice for a split that I have read, and
>the first one that I definatly would vote yes to.

What about all the poor HP28 users who don't want to suffer all of the HP48
internal information?  If I was a HP28 user, I would be rather upset about
having to read the 48 volume.

As a user of both the 28 and the 48, I wouldn't mind both groups of users
being put into a single news group.  I can accept the fact that the 28
users will be swamped by the 48 volume.  I am not going to vote in
favour of ANY split that places a minority group (like the 28) in with
the 48.



        						Pauli
seeya

Paul Dale               | Internet/CSnet:            grue@cs.uq.oz.au
Dept of Computer Science| Bitnet:       grue%cs.uq.oz.au@uunet.uu.net
Uni of Qld              | JANET:           grue%cs.uq.oz.au@uk.ac.ukc
Australia, 4072         | EAN:                          grue@cs.uq.oz
                        | UUCP:           uunet!munnari!cs.uq.oz!grue
f4e6g4Qh4++             | JUNET:                     grue@cs.uq.oz.au
--