Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!att!linac!uwm.edu!wuarchive!sdd.hp.com!hp-pcd!hpcvra.cv.hp.com!rnews!hpcvbbs!akcs.jdn From: akcs.jdn@hpcvbbs.UUCP (John D. Nguyen) Newsgroups: comp.sys.handhelds Subject: Re: RE Rom releases. READ THIS AND QUIT COMPLAINING Message-ID: <27dd1b94:2142.3comp.sys.handhelds;1@hpcvbbs.UUCP> Date: 12 Mar 91 18:40:07 GMT References: <3532@gmuvax2.gmu.edu> <1991Feb21.224141.28406@bigsur.uucp> Lines: 27 Dave, I bought a 48SX Revision D, and I think the bugs had something to do with symbolic complex numbers. I'm not sure, this is what I've heard through another person. I've done complex number computations and as far as I can tell, the anwers were correct. So, I wouldn't worry too much about doing bad on an exam because your HP failed you. Unless, of course you do a lot of symbolic as oppose to numeric work involving complex numbers. Again, I don't really know if this problem is for sure. I think Bob Peraino (the person who started on the subject of people "whining") is missing the point when he stated that he didn't expect software company to give him free upgrades just because the latest version is better. First, the 48SX is not software, it's a calculator when you strip all the fancy I/O, displays, etc. out of it. People depend on this tool to be absolutely correct. Since HP knows (or should anyway) how much harder it is to replace the firmware inside the 48SX, they should've waited. The calculator would not only be "better", it would be more ACCURATE. This is the reason why people are complaining, not necessarily about whether or not it's fancier, but rather whether or not they can whole-heartedly trus the functions that it was advertised to do. And if that can be construed as whining, then by all means, count me in as one of the "whiners". HP didn't do it right, and I hope this doesn't mean that they'll be mum and keep secrets about future releases. I hope they will learn from us users and release a more sound 48SX (or a newer calc) in the future. John Nguyen