Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!ukc!axion!vision!ukpoit!alan
From: alan@ukpoit.co.uk (Alan Barclay)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.handhelds
Subject: Re: RPN intuitive?
Message-ID: <1991Mar12.172157.401@ukpoit.co.uk>
Date: 12 Mar 91 17:21:57 GMT
References: <7645@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <BOB.91Mar11161503@dolores.Stanford.EDU>
Organization: iT - The Information Technology Business Of The Post Office
Lines: 13

In article <BOB.91Mar11161503@dolores.Stanford.EDU> bob@dolores.Stanford.EDU (Bob Lodenkamper) writes:
>In article <7645@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> ahernsd@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Dynastar) writes:
>
>   only one in the world who feels that RPN is the intuitively
>   obvous way of doing things?
>
>It not intuitively obvious at all, but once RPN is burned into the
>

I would say the both systems are equally obvious, it's just that
we are used to one system or another, after all if someone asks
you to 'take 3 and 4 and add them' it's obvious what he wants to
do. Equally 'Take 3 and add it to 4'.