Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!eagle!galaxy!hubler From: hubler@galaxy.lerc.nasa.gov (Dale Hubler) Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix Subject: Re: BASH and GCC Message-ID: <1991Mar10.164350.25082@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov> Date: 10 Mar 91 16:43:50 GMT References: <1274@dkunix9.dk.oracle.com> <2547@sirius.ucs.adelaide.edu.au> <1991Mar6.190227.14110@odin.corp.sgi.com> Sender: news@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov Reply-To: hubler@galaxy.UUCP (Dale Hubler) Distribution: comp.unix.aix Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio Lines: 18 In article kstailey@geech.ai.mit.edu (Kenneth Stailey) writes: >According to the new pink GnusBulletin GCC 2.0 will support the >RS/6000. Even though it does not optimize well for RISC gcc will be >nice because it doesn't eat up all the swap space on the machine, it >produces normal-looking error messages (ones that Emacs can step >through), it has the same behaviour on multiple machines which makes >porting easier and the source code is available at little or no cost. One other benefit of having GCC ported is that G++ cannot be built without GCC. Is anybody at FSF working on G++ availability for the RS6000? -- Dale A. Hubler -- Sverdrup Technology -- (216) 977-7014 hubler@galaxy.lerc.nasa.gov "There is no room in democracy for intolerant people, Therefore they should all be rounded up, taken out back, and shot"