Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!brtmac
From: brtmac@maverick.ksu.ksu.edu (Brett McCoy)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.internals
Subject: Re: Should find traverse symbolic links?
Message-ID: <1991Mar12.001409.25168@maverick.ksu.ksu.edu>
Date: 12 Mar 91 00:14:09 GMT
References: <1991Feb25.130613.2553@phri.nyu.edu> <1991Feb25.143543.4213@mp.cs.niu.edu> <1991Mar8.152932.5242@investor.pgh.pa.us> <125283@uunet.UU.NET>
Sender: news@maverick.ksu.ksu.edu (The News Guru)
Organization: Kansas State University
Lines: 20

In <125283@uunet.UU.NET> rbj@uunet.UU.NET (Root Boy Jim) writes:

>In article <1991Mar8.152932.5242@investor.pgh.pa.us> rbp@investor.pgh.pa.us (Bob Peirce #305) writes:
>>Altos' find does traverse symbolic links...

>Altos' find is broken.

My opinion is that there should be a flag much like the -xdev flag that
tells find whether or not to traverse symbolic links.  I have a lot of
symbolic link directories to allow directories to be in the correct place
in the hierarchy, but allows all of the data to be stashed on another
filesystem that has the room.  Not being able to do a find down into
these directories is a pain to say the least.

--
"I wrote a lisp program once...it wrote back to me." -- unknown
Reality is for people who can't deal with drugs.
Brett McCoy			Computing and Telecommunications Activities
brtmac@maverick.ksu.ksu.edu	Kansas State University