Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!crdgw1!sixhub!davidsen From: davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (Wm E. Davidsen Jr) Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386 Subject: Re: Dell "Support" for Dell machines Message-ID: <3407@sixhub.UUCP> Date: 8 Mar 91 04:58:12 GMT References: <534@psitech.com> Reply-To: davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (bill davidsen) Organization: *IX Public Access UNIX, Schenectady NY Lines: 61 In article <534@psitech.com> bob@psitech.com (Bob Posert) writes: | It looks to me like Dell is a DOS company that sells UNIX. I'd prefer | to buy from a company that sells mated software and hardware, and will | recommend purchases of real workstations in the future. Suns are | looking better all the time. I can't defend the support group because I'm not impressed yet, either. But I do disgree about the company. They have a very fine and competent UNIX development staff, and a support staff which isn't up to speed, seems confused and disorganized. They are not OEMing UNIX from someone else, they have in-house expertise, although it may not be getting the horsepower to the ground from the customer standpoint. I have tried to offer suggestions on how they could do it better, since I have been on both sides of support for some decades now, but I either haven't gotten to the right person or haven't convinced him/her that I have dealt with companies which do better and I can tell them how to do better, too. I believe that sales is looking for more features, while the customers are looking for the current features to be working better. However, I do have faith that the product will get the bugs worked out, and that I will get the bug fixed versions of the parts which are not correct. In the meantime I still find it worth keeping a personal machine to run their software. I had beta versions from three vendors, and the Dell is at least usefully stable. I really like having all the window managers and libraries, so I can run most of my X tools. For the record I am looking for: + a better X server I want 1024x768 and 1152x900. I don't want to compile the server myself, there aren't enough hours in a day to fix every utiltiy in UNIX over again. + gcc ready to run same story, yes I can (have) port it, but there's no time. I want to plug and play. The native compiler generates slow code beyond belief. The whole X library should be redone with gcc. + bus mouse support this has been dragging since November. It has cost them the chance to even be considered for a contract. I want my trackball back! Three things out of all of V.4 aren't too bad, and at least what's there doesn't crash all the time. I could say some bad things about the speed of the tape driver, but I made it faster by putting in 12MB of memory and using 3MB double buffering. Not subtle or cheap, but effective. Overall I would give Dell the benefit of the doubt on support for now. I believe they're putting resources into the problem, but not using them effectively as yet. I could be wrong, in which case I will have a huge SX systems and nothing to run on it, but for the moment I'm hopeful they will get their support act up to the speed of the technical staff. -- bill davidsen - davidsen@sixhub.uucp (uunet!crdgw1!sixhub!davidsen) sysop *IX BBS and Public Access UNIX moderator of comp.binaries.ibm.pc and 80386 mailing list "Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me