Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!att!linac!mp.cs.niu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uicsl.csl.uiuc.edu!brando From: brando@uicsl.csl.uiuc.edu (Brandon Brown) Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386 Subject: Re: ISC dual boot Message-ID: <1991Mar12.143356.260@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> Date: 12 Mar 91 14:33:56 GMT References: <1991Feb25.210428.4566@world.std.com> <995@redford.UUCP> <1991Mar4.141901.4772@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <1991Mar5.142716.10448@bilver.uucp> Sender: usenet@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (News) Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana Lines: 32 bill@bilver.uucp (Bill Vermillion) writes: >In article <1991Mar4.141901.4772@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> brando@uicsl.csl.uiuc.edu (Brandon Brown) writes: >>bill@polygen.uucp (Bill Poitras) writes: > >(prior comments on vp.ix drive access deleted) > >>Well as far as on power-up I believe someone posted a small little "boot menu" >>for ISC to boot either to DOS or Unix on the initial boot, but I wouldn't >>recommend it, unless you really switch between the two alot. I would use the` >>"fdisk" commands on both Unix and DOS to switch between the two. >Well I would surely recommend >AGAINST< fooling with the fdisk. I have >seen systems get wiped out with this. Some systems furnish a dual boot, if >not get the one posted here, or do the following (which I recommend to all >those I work for who don't want/have the dual boot option. How would simply changing the active partition wipe the disk? Unless you delete the partition, what harm could you possibly inflict? >I have never had problem with the dual boot. I have never had a problem with "fdisk". +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Brandon Brown | Internet: brando@uicsl.csl.uiuc.edu | | Coordinated Science Laboratory | UUCP: uiucuxc!addamax!brando!brown | | University of Illinois | CompuServe: 73040,447 | | Urbana, IL 61801 | GEnie: macbrando | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+