Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!milton!ogicse!intelhf!ichips!iwarp.intel.com!csun!kithrup!sef
From: sef@kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Why can't elves cough?
Message-ID: <1991Mar13.095416.7172@kithrup.COM>
Date: 13 Mar 91 09:54:16 GMT
References: <6405@unix386.Convergent.COM> <10719@scolex.sco.COM> <6765@unix386.Convergent.COM>
Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd.
Lines: 18

In article <6765@unix386.Convergent.COM> mburg@unix386.Convergent.COM (Mike Burg) writes:
>But the one context of  the original message was abourt vendor support
>for _binary_ ABI's.. - i.e. What is SCO going to do about ELF?

While I know nothing about what SCO is going to do about ELF (really, truly,
and honestly; I don't really care, either 8-)), I would like to point out
that the two issues (ELF and the ABI) are mutually irrelevant.  That is, the
ABI specifies a whole bunch of things, including the COFF file format.  As a
result, if you want to conform to the ABI, you get to use COFF.  For SysVr4,
I think they just end up with different system-call entry points for each
file format (that is, ELF goes through one table, COFF through another,
x.out through yet another, etc.), which I must admit is a very nice thing.

-- 
Sean Eric Fagan  | "I made the universe, but please don't blame me for it;
sef@kithrup.COM  |  I had a bellyache at the time."
-----------------+           -- The Turtle (Stephen King, _It_)
Any opinions expressed are my own, and generally unpopular with others.