Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.ircc.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bgsuvax!ruthenb
From: ruthenb@bgsuvax.UUCP (Joe Ruthenberg)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Font Managers for Windows 3.0
Message-ID: <7119@bgsuvax.UUCP>
Date: 10 Mar 91 18:24:28 GMT
References: <20553.27d955bc@oregon.uoregon.edu>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Bowling Green State University B.G., Oh.
Lines: 15


I currently use ATM on one machine (at work) and Bitstream's Facelift
on my home machine. ATM has the big advantage of lots of public domain
fonts (cica.cica.indiana.edu has about 100 of them), and has the nifty
synonym feature that lets you reassign fonts like Helv and Tms Rmn to
the bundled versions that are much nicer. Facelift has better printer
control and will generate HP laserjet softfonts. The printed output from 
the two programs is about the same, although I would give Bitstream a
slight edge. However, if you have a Laserjet, Facelift will speed
its operation by about 150% Amazing. 

Hope that helps.

Joe Ruthenberg
ruthenbe@einstein.bgsu.edu