Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!wuarchive!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!milton!sumax!amc-gw!quick!cctb!curt
From: curt@cctb.wa.com (Curt Johnson)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: need 1024x768 monitor, advice about using it with herc
Message-ID: <7h7pf8h9c@cctb.wa.com>
Date: 11 Mar 91 08:43:09 GMT
References: <1991Mar10.203542.27095@news.iastate.edu>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Chemical Computer Thinking Battery, Redmond, WA
Lines: 19

In article <1991Mar10.203542.27095@news.iastate.edu> i1neal@exnet.iastate.edu (Neal Rauhauser -- ) writes:
|       NEC multisync 3D. I've seen these in use, and like 'em a lot.
|       If theres something cheap that works as well, I'd go for it,
|       but I've found skimping on hardware always bites you in the ass,
|       sooner or later.
| 
|     If you've had a bad experience with either of these devices, or
| think you know something better, mail me.

I have a Sony 1304 at home, I've used a 3D in the past.  I like the Sony
better (mostly because the Sony does 1024x768 non-interlaced).  I couldn't
get the 3D to work in 1024x768 (I think the video card I had (or maybe it
was the driver) would only do non-interlaced, and the 3D can only do 
1024x768 interlaced).

When I was computer shopping, I called around Seattle and found someone
who would sell the Sony for $650.  I don't know what it costs in Iowa,
but I'd think that you should be able to find in mail order for less than
$650.