Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!think.com!mintaka!spdcc!tauxersvilli!alphalpha!nazgul
From: nazgul@alphalpha.com (Kee Hinckley)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: Flaw in Xt init sequence (but with simple fix)
Message-ID: <1991Mar8.005715.7363@alphalpha.com>
Date: 8 Mar 91 00:57:15 GMT
References: <1991Feb28.005057.24723@watdragon.waterloo.edu> <100920307@hpcvlx.cv.hp.com>
Organization: asi
Lines: 13

In article <100920307@hpcvlx.cv.hp.com> tomg@hpcvlx.cv.hp.com (Thomas J. Gilg) writes:
>BTW - the lack of a true shared library technology on a vendors OS is not
>grounds for calling them non-UNIX.   Expand on that, EVERY vendor I know
No, in fact I'd be more inclined to say that the *presence* of true shared
libraries is grounds for calling them non-Unix.		:-,
-- 
Alfalfa Software, Inc.          |       Poste:  The EMail for Unix
nazgul@alfalfa.com              |       Send Anything... Anywhere
617/646-7703 (voice/fax)        |       info@alfalfa.com

I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
everyone else's.