Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!paperboy!osf!dbrooks
From: dbrooks@osf.osf.org (David Brooks)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: choice of toolkits
Message-ID: <19916@paperboy.OSF.ORG>
Date: 13 Mar 91 01:14:20 GMT
References: <9103110058.AA02712@mole.ai.mit.edu> <1991Mar11.115350.26950@alphalpha.com> <1991Mar13.003649.1108@convex.com>
Sender: news@OSF.ORG
Reply-To: dbrooks@osf.org (David Brooks)
Organization: Open Software Foundation
Lines: 16

datri@convex.com (Anthony A. Datri) writes:
>
>Well, so far as I know, the OSF/Motif toolkit doesn't support shared/dynamic
>libraries even on the platforms that have the capability -- ie., SunOS.
							     ^^
You mean e.g., I hope.  Lots have people have successfully built Motif
shared libraries under SunOS and several other OSes.  Including us :-)

>This shortcoming and the resultant immense size of executables comprise the
>lion's share of my discontent with Motif.

Oh good; nothing of any importance left, then?
-- 
David Brooks				dbrooks@osf.org
Systems Engineering, OSF		uunet!osf.org!dbrooks
"It's not easy, but it is simple."