Xref: utzoo sci.electronics:18265 talk.religion.misc:36579 sci.bio:4558 Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!lll-winken!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen!sun4!jwm From: jwm@sun4.uucp (James W. Meritt) Newsgroups: sci.electronics,talk.religion.misc,sci.bio Subject: Re: Forrest Mimms fired by Scientific American Message-ID: <1991Mar7.110841.19330@aplcen.apl.jhu.edu> Date: 7 Mar 91 11:08:41 GMT References: <17200@sdcc6.ucsd.edu> <5472@tellab5.tellabs.com> <1120@dvnspc1.Dev.Unisys.COM> <1991Mar7.013827.19891@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> Sender: news@aplcen.apl.jhu.edu (USENET News System) Organization: Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Lines: 30 In article <1991Mar7.013827.19891@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> pcjg7045@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Pramod C. John) writes: }tom@dvnspc1.Dev.Unisys.COM (Tom Albrecht) writes: } }>In article <5472@tellab5.tellabs.com> pauls@tellabs.com (Paul Silver) writes: }>If the witch doctor had an advanced degree from an accredited university }>and had demonstrated the ability to conduct independent, scholarly }>research, why not? } } I firmly believe that the Scientific American had absolutely no right }to fire the guy over the reason claimed. Since when has the right of people in }the scientific community to believe what they want to believe in been revoked? It hasn't. Since when have magazine writer's beliefs been revoked by magazine public relation's offices? }What in the world is the Scientific Community coming to? When did a popular magazine become part of "the scientific community"? Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not necessarily represent those opinions of this or any other organization. The facts, however, simply are and do not "belong" to anyone. jwm@sun4.jhuapl.edu or jwm@aplcen.apl.jhu.edu or meritt%aplvm.BITNET