Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnews!cbnews!military
From: v059l49z@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Paul C Stacy)
Newsgroups: sci.military
Subject: Re: *** United States Military Forces in Kuwaiti Theatre
Message-ID: <1991Mar8.022655.8877@cbnews.att.com>
Date: 8 Mar 91 02:26:55 GMT
References: <1991Feb21.031014.12249@cbnews.att.com>
Sender: military@cbnews.att.com (william.b.thacker)
Organization: University at Buffalo
Lines: 20
Approved: military@att.att.com



From: v059l49z@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Paul C Stacy)

In article <1991Feb21.031014.12249@cbnews.att.com>, kagst@unix.cis.pitt.edu (Kevin A. Geiselman) writes...> 
>In Place: Army and Marine Equipment
>===================================
>Numbers are professional estimates as of 13 December 1990.
> 
>Armor
>	 10 LAV (Army)

Army LAV's?  Did the Army get LAV's afterall?  I read there was some pressure
on the Army to re-evaluate it after the invasion of Panama.  Is this the same
one as the Marines use (or how is it different?)




				Paul "Joe Friday" Stacy