Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!uunet!ora!ambar From: jdravk@speech2.cs.cmu.edu (Jeanette Dravk) Newsgroups: soc.feminism Subject: Re: The Equality of Men & Women Message-ID: <1991Mar8.140731.5396@ora.com> Date: 8 Mar 91 14:07:31 GMT References: <66039@brunix.UUCP> Sender: ambar@ora.com (Jean Marie Diaz) Organization: Barbie's Dream Dungeon Lines: 30 Approved: ambar@ora.com In article <66039@brunix.UUCP> Felix Yen writes: >jdravk@speech2.cs.cmu.edu (Jeanette Dravk) responds: >> As I recall, the biggies are the socialist feminists, the marxist feminist, >> the moral purists (the new moral right), the radical feminists, and the >> cultural feminists. >Some would argue that this is merely a list of names. Yup. That's what I think too. That's why I said after that big long thing that "the average feminist is somewhere in the middle of all that". >I would add that if "feminism" is practically meaningless, and I >believe it is, then it makes little sense to try to subdivide it. It certainly is! That's why I really don't see any point in identifying with it. Which is a real shame, because there *are* common goals that all so-called "feminists" seem to share .. however much they may discredited each other or be discredited themselves. j- -- #*#*#*#*#*# Transient Creature of the Wide, Wild World #*#*#*#*#*#*#* "Time is not linear to me, it is a nebulous web of existential freedom."