Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ora!ambar
From: gazit@cs.duke.edu (Hillel Gazit)
Newsgroups: soc.feminism
Subject: Re: Scholarly objective evaluations of AA
Message-ID: <668543857@lear.cs.duke.edu>
Date: 13 Mar 91 11:28:29 GMT
References: 667506522@lime.cs.duke.edu> <1991Mar8.195502.12099@ora.com>
Sender: ambar@ora.com (Jean Marie Diaz)
Organization: The Piranha Club
Lines: 22
Approved: ambar@ora.com


#I would agree with Lurkette that scholarly studies are probably more
#accurate than the perceptions of ethnic males; 

$I wonder what you will say after "scholarly studies" will tell you
$that women are better off when they have to sit at home and raise
$kids...

In article <1991Mar8.195502.12099@ora.com> (Jeanette Dravk) writes:
>Hmm... so I guess *men* would be better off staying at home raising the
>kids too, right?  So why don't we _all_ just sit at home and watch the
>little ones crawl around?

Two women claimed that affirmative action for women is good for men,
and used some studies to justify their position.  Would you, or them,
or the rest of net.feminists will think about reversing the argument
and claiming that affirmative action for "white ethnic males" will be
good for a woman?

I guess that being a woman who is looking for revenge and/or a
feminist means that you can reverse the sexes only in one half of the
examples...