Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!elf.ee.lbl.gov!torek
From: torek@elf.ee.lbl.gov (Chris Torek)
Newsgroups: comp.bugs.4bsd
Subject: Re: February BSD tapes status request
Message-ID: <10969@dog.ee.lbl.gov>
Date: 15 Mar 91 01:05:42 GMT
References: <26809@rouge.usl.edu>
Reply-To: torek@elf.ee.lbl.gov (Chris Torek)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley
Lines: 13
X-Local-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 91 17:05:42 PST

In article <26809@rouge.usl.edu> pml4791@rouge.usl.edu (Landry Patrick M)
writes:
>Did I miss the announcement of availability of the February
>BAD tapes or did they slip? Just wondering...

`BAD tapes' would be the right name: the networking releases should be
considered alpha software, but any snapshot from February would not
even have been alpha quality (alpha means `it probably almost works;
please test but be aware that we expect you to find bugs', and things
were known not even to be `almost' working in Feb.).
-- 
In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Lawrence Berkeley Lab EE div (+1 415 486 5427)
Berkeley, CA		Domain:	torek@ee.lbl.gov