Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!menudo.uh.edu!sugar!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp Subject: Re: UUPSI's new rules Message-ID: Date: 15 Mar 91 02:08:08 GMT References: <1991Mar11.143824.24170@searchtech.com> <50462@olivea.atc.olivetti.com> Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 12 In article <50462@olivea.atc.olivetti.com> jerry@olivey.ATC.Olivetti.Com (Jerry Aguirre) writes: > The term "third party" seems to be used in a strange way here. When I > think of "third party" as applied to the telephone or postal mail it > means someone other than the originator or intended recipiant. In this case it means a third party not mentioned on the original contract. I have a question... are people with contract paid up beyond the 45 days getting the letter? Now that might be a problem. -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' peter@ferranti.com +1 713 274 5180. 'U` "Have you hugged your wolf today?"