Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!caen!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!rsiatl!nanovx!dragon!cts
From: cts@dragon.uucp (Charles T. Smith, Jr.)
Newsgroups: comp.org.decus
Subject: Re: DECUS and E-Mail (Was Re: DECUS Board of Directors Election)
Message-ID: <376.27e14400@dragon.uucp>
Date: 15 Mar 91 22:00:32 GMT
References: <4496@dftsrv.gsfc.nasa.gov> <009451A5.83C422A0@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU> <1991Mar4.195334.15166@news.arc.nasa.gov> <353.27d533c4@dragon.uucp> <943@hadron.COM>
Distribution: na
Organization: Computer Projects Unlimited
Lines: 19

In article <943@hadron.COM>, klr@hadron.COM (Kurt L. Reisler) writes:
> In article <353.27d533c4@dragon.uucp> cts@dragon.uucp (Charles T. Smith, Jr.) writes:
> 
>>One of the biggest problems in dealing with Decus is finding the responsible
>>party.  For example, who is responsible for the policy of keeping DCS off the
>>net.  I for one would be happy to place a few phone calls.
> 
> At a DECUS meeting held this weekend, I was told that DCS "should have
> two-way Email access via the InterNet by March 15th".  The person who
> was responsible is no longer "with us", and the person who has taken
> over just found out what the blockage was, and is removing it.  Of
> course, 3/15 is a VMS-timeframe date (:-), which means "real soon now".
> 
> I will keep those who lurk in the aether informed.

Well, its 3/15.  

Also, you sure prove my point.  Just who is this responsible person?
Perhaps they have a name?  And a phone number?