Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!ukc!axion!uzi-9mm.fulcrum.bt.co.uk!igb
From: igb@fulcrum.bt.co.uk (Ian G Batten)
Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
Subject: Re: Fooling the censors
Message-ID: <KRH&A6=@uzi-9mm.fulcrum.bt.co.uk>
Date: 13 Mar 91 13:19:11 GMT
References: <CNH5730.91Mar7100654@maraba.tamu.edu> <1991Mar13.033143.29172@ddsw1.MCS.COM> <|RH&^5=@uzi-9mm.fulcrum.bt.co.uk>
Sender: news@fulcrum.bt.co.uk (News with an UZI)
Organization: BT Fulcrum, Birmingham
Lines: 18

In article <|RH&^5=@uzi-9mm.fulcrum.bt.co.uk> I write:
> In article <1991Mar13.033143.29172@ddsw1.MCS.COM> zane@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Sameer Parekh) writes:
> >I would submit that the only reason news feeds have been able to get
> >away with this so far is that no legal case has been initiated in
> >which quality lawyers have been enlisted. I, for one, would be willing
> >to donate to such a case if a lawyer like William Kunstler were
> >retained.

He didn't, of course.  The correct attribution is:

In article <CNH5730.91Mar7100654@maraba.tamu.edu> 
           cnh5730@maraba.tamu.edu writes:

Sorry Sameer.

``We apologise for the inconvenience.''

ian