Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!ccu.umanitoba.ca!herald.usask.ca!alberta!aunro!aupair.cs.athabascau.ca!atha!decwrl!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!menudo.uh.edu!lobster!sugar!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.os.minix Subject: Re: comp.os.minix splitup Message-ID: Date: 13 Mar 91 15:06:44 GMT References: <30737@usc> <9146@star.cs.vu.nl> <9222@star.cs.vu.nl> Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 15 In article <9222@star.cs.vu.nl> ast@cs.vu.nl (Andy Tanenbaum) writes: > I would assume that anything containing code would go to the sources > group. Even if it is a large explanation and 1 line of cdiff. This is perfectly acceptable. Patches are a substantial fraction of the traffic in existing sources groups. > Calling it comp.minix.sources will make clear that this is not a regular > source group, but a subset of the MINIX discussion. I assume you mean comp.os.minix.sources. That sounds like a good idea, if the idea of a moderator is abhorrent. -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' peter@ferranti.com +1 713 274 5180. 'U` "Have you hugged your wolf today?"