Xref: utzoo comp.protocols.nfs:1977 comp.windows.ms:10347 comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc:5181 Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!sunic!ericom!california.ericsson.se!etxsral From: etxsral@california.ericsson.se (Lars Nilsson) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs,comp.windows.ms,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc Subject: Re: Sun PC-NFS deficiencies Message-ID: <1991Mar14.194005.19662@ericsson.se> Date: 14 Mar 91 19:40:05 GMT References: <1991Mar13.180625.14540@amd.com> Sender: news@ericsson.se Organization: Ericsson Telecom, Stockholm, Sweden Lines: 20 Here is my opinion about PC-NFS versus Novell: PC-NFS,PC-TCP etc is not meant to be a full-blown PC-network. PC-NFS is a way to use PC's towards an Unix-network. PC-NFS and PC-TCP is configured in a more unix-like way this makes it easier for the Unix-system managers to configure the PC's If you want a PC -- PC network then buy a PC-lan as Novell. If you want a PC -- UNIX network then buy PC-nfs or similar(I like PC-TCP). /Lars Nilsson -- Lars Nilsson Ericsson Telecom AB , Stockholm - Sweden E-mail: etxsral@california.ericsson.se Fidonet: Lars Nilsson @ 2:201/108.7