Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cbmvax!bagate!dsinc!unix.cis.pitt.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!psuvax1!news
From: melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: Mac and Amiga (Games--Macintosh vs A500)
Message-ID: <ml5G*ez!@cs.psu.edu>
Date: 15 Mar 91 02:44:45 GMT
References: <7816@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
	<1991Mar14.052507.19830@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
	<7906@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
	<1991Mar14.231832.7342@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
	<7921@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet)
Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Lines: 13
In-Reply-To: blissmer@expert.cc.purdue.edu's message of 15 Mar 91 00:52:52 GMT
Nntp-Posting-Host: sunws5.sys.cs.psu.edu


In article <7921@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> blissmer@expert.cc.purdue.edu (Kevin) writes:


   True, but Appletalk is great for 3 or 4 machine networks (sharing modems,
   printers, plotters).  It's all I've ever used at a non-university location.  
   Ethernet is overkill for most of the small businesses I've seen using macs.  
   Appletalk is flexible and cheap and widely supported.

Ethernet is overkill.  You must be joking.  Anything less is
unacceptable.

-Mike