Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cbmvax!bagate!dsinc!unix.cis.pitt.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-picayune.mit.edu!athena.mit.edu!amgreene From: amgreene@athena.mit.edu (Andrew Marc Greene) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: Innovation (was Re: Mac and Amiga (Games--Macintosh vs A500)) Message-ID: <1991Mar15.142928.11358@athena.mit.edu> Date: 15 Mar 91 14:29:28 GMT References: <1991Mar13.221028.8703@neon.Stanford.EDU> <19880@cbmvax.commodore.com> <1991Mar15.092133.16140@neon.Stanford.EDU> Sender: news@athena.mit.edu (News system) Organization: Plucky Duck Fan Club Lines: 34 In article <1991Mar15.092133.16140@neon.Stanford.EDU> torrie@cs.stanford.edu (Evan Torrie) writes: >daveh@cbmvax.commodore.com (Dave Haynie) writes: > >>Letsee. Apple introduced the Mac in 1983. > > January 1984 actually. When was Lisa introduced, and how different was it from the first Macs? (I'm asking sincerely -- I don't recall.) > The issue of the hard disk interface is really a red herring. If >you're running a preemptive multi-tasking system, then yes, you really >want DMA, and not polling. But Apple wasn't, and still isn't for most >of its machines. I think that that's why it's not a red herring. Call me spoiled, but I *like* my preemptive multi-tasking system. :-) [He then quotes Dave H again:] >>The Amiga UNIX has the potential to attract UNIX people to the Amiga, >>since it is in all ways a modern, standard UNIX. > > This has already been well beaten out on this group, but I fall in >the camp who have a hard job seeing Unix people being attracted to an >Amiga when they could have a NeXT instead. Count me in as one Unix person who was attracted to the Amiga, even before the UX models came out. I'm running a csh, and I've got all my usual utilities, and I'm only on a lowly 2500. :-) Seriously, the reason I bought an Amiga was because it was closer to a workstation than anything else I'd seen -- including the NeXT, which felt like a multi-tasking Mac, not like a Unix box. -- Andrew | .sigs are for people with bandwidth to burn