Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!lethe!yunexus!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cbmvax!bagate!dsinc!unix.cis.pitt.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!menudo.uh.edu!lobster!sugar!peter From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc Subject: Re: Amiga vs. Mac Message-ID: <1991Mar13.131425.9718@sugar.hackercorp.com> Date: 13 Mar 91 13:14:25 GMT References: <1991Mar10.192823.30103@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> <1991Mar10.204119.22113@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> <4210.27db9aac@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu> Organization: Sugar Land Unix -- Houston, TX Lines: 12 In article <4210.27db9aac@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu> rlcollins@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu (Ryan 'Gozar' Collins) writes: > Logically, to the new computer user, could you really recommend an Amiga > 500 over a Mac Classic? (especially a computer neophyte?) Sure. I used to recommend Macs for neophytes, even over Amigas, but (a) the Amiga has become much nicer, and (b) I can't in good conscience promote Apple products any more. ( and now I'm gonna have to consider dumping my AT&T long distance :-< ) -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' .