Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!cs.umn.edu!uc!noc.MR.NET!gacvx2.gac.edu!hhdist
From: IUGC500@INDYVAX.IUPUI.EDU (David Holland IUGC500@INDYVAX)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.handhelds
Subject: RE: CFV:  comp.sys.hp48 moderated and comp.sys.hp48.d
Message-ID: <4DADEA4D000094CE@INDYVAX.IUPUI.EDU>
Date: 17 Mar 91 00:29:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: INDYVAX.4DADEA4D000094CE
Lines: 18
Return-path: <IUGC500@INDYVAX.IUPUI.EDU>
To: handhelds@gac.edu
X-VMS-To: IN%"handhelds@gac.edu"

A point to be made to the guy who was complaining that the 
split hadn't been discussed long enough on news.announce.newgroups
(or where ever he was saying it was supposed to be discussed.)

I'd like to know how we small peon's on the gateway would of been able
to follow that particular discussion?  I mean, I may of not said much
on the matter, but I did follow what was being discussed. So I think
in the long run it was better that it was discussed on the list, instead
of the "proper" group.

Also, was there ever any determination as to what would happen
to the people on the gateway?  I personally wouldn't mind being able
to get on both groups, if that's at all possible.. 

bye all

David Holland
IUGC500@INDYVAX (BITNET)
IUGC500@INDYVAX.IUPUI.EDU (INTERNET)