Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!stephenc From: stephenc@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Stephen Chung) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Subject: Re: Gateway 2000 Computers Message-ID: <1991Mar16.164944.30046@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> Date: 16 Mar 91 16:49:44 GMT References: <1991Mar8.011318.28717@mathcs.sjsu.edu> <1991Mar12.152048.2065@persoft.com> Reply-To: stephenc@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Stephen Chung) Distribution: usa Organization: Columbia University Lines: 20 In article jc58+@andrew.cmu.edu (Johnny J. Chin) writes: >In summary ... I have to say DO NOT BUY THEM! ... I have heard from too many >people here (on campus) and back home in NYC who have bought a GATEWAY computer >because they are CHEAP. And that is exactly what they are ... CHEAP ... in >price as well as quality. Many of them had problems with right out of the box. >Things from not running protected-mode software properly (ie. freezing after a >few minutes) to system dropping dead altogether (things such as motherboards >and power supplies). My friends, who have used GATEWAY said that they will >never buy one from them again; and will spend a little more money and get a >much more reliable system. I have a Gateway 25MHz 386 and there is *ABSOLUTELY NOTHING* that I am not satisfied with. It did not give me any problems at all. From what I heard, the favorable/unfavorable ratio (Internet, Magazines etc.) is about 50:1. Yes, I live in NYC, and all the people I know who have Gateways like it very much. I have never heard of Gateway computers being faulty right out of the box, at least so far. I suppose that the students in CMU are not using computers in the right way? - Stephen