Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!psuvax1!sol4!cho From: cho@sol4.cs.psu.edu (Sehyeong Cho) Newsgroups: comp.sys.laptops Subject: Re: Overkill? Keywords: 286 vs 386 notebooks Message-ID: <875Gc8c01@cs.psu.edu> Date: 15 Mar 91 17:23:09 GMT References: <1991Mar15.161610.22500@cbnewsl.att.com> Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet) Distribution: usa Organization: Penn State Computer Science Lines: 20 Nntp-Posting-Host: sol4.cs.psu.edu In article <1991Mar15.161610.22500@cbnewsl.att.com> sgore@cbnewsl.att.com (stephanie.gore) writes: >??286??386??1MB??5MB??20MB??60MB????286??386??1MB??5MB??20MB??60MB?? > > >I will be buying a laptop, actually a notebook, within the next >couple of months. I want to do basic word processing, probably >using LetterPerfect (downscaled WordPerfect), store papers, >store research info, etc. and use the laptop as a terminal. > >The advice I've received suggests that I should get a 386 machine >with at least 4MB RAM. My question is: is this overkill? I know ... Your friend must be a millionaire. (Or knows you are a millionaire :-) -- | Yesterday I was a student. Sehyeong Cho | Today I am a student. cho@cs.psu.edu | Tomorrow I'll probably still be a student. | Sigh.. There's so little hope for advancement.