Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!pacbell.com!att!news.cs.indiana.edu!cs.widener.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!vax1.cc.lehigh.edu!lehi3b15!batman!halkoD
From: halkoD@batman.moravian.EDU (David Halko)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.m6809
Subject: Re: TC9
Summary: TC9
Message-ID: <3137@batman.moravian.EDU>
Date: 14 Mar 91 21:03:11 GMT
References: <22@sandv.UUCP> <2567@batman.moravian.EDU> <4996@mcrware.UUCP> <5172@mcrware.UUCP>
Organization: Moravian College, Bethlehem, PA
Lines: 16

In article <5172@mcrware.UUCP>, jejones@mcrware.UUCP (James Jones) writes:
> In article <2752@batman.moravian.EDU> halkoD@batman.moravian.EDU (David Halko) writes:
> >The extra CPU boost should make any program at least as fast as it was
> >originally.
> 
> What extra CPU boost?  Since, if I understand correctly, the 6309 in the
> TC9 won't run any faster than the 68B09 in the CoCo 3, I don't know what
> you mean by that.
> 
> 	James Jones

From what I understand, the 68B09 in the TC9 is running at a full 2 MHz
instead of 1.78 MHz, which is .22 MHz faster... this is a little extra
boost in speed...

	Dave Halko